NickDawson.net

Icon

From Virginia and many fine airports. Healthcare administration, foodie, music buff and fan of all things porcine, skis backwards

What can healthcare organizations learn from Obama about communications?

Its a tricky topic, one that sparks off a debate fueled by passionate emotions and virulent opinions. Healthcare reform is a hot topic.

Regardless of one’s feelings about the topic, there is a lot to admire about how President Obama and the White House communicate and garner support for their program. In fact, it is a perfect model for how healthcare organizations can join the conversation.

Today, the White House hosted a live internet town hall event.  The President made his pitch and answered questions from constituents. While the use of internet streaming video is an admirable step, it is not what made this event so remarkable.

Several weeks before the town hall meeting, the White House invited the American public to submit questions via FaceBook and YouTube. During the live event, the President addressed some of those questions (including some from Twitter). Understandably the vast majority of the questions went unanswered, but that is where the two-way internet kicks in. What the White House has done is to get people talking directly to people. No pundits, no news anchors with an agenda, no editorial commentary and faux news channels telling people what to think… The White House is tapping into the passions and energy of the public at large. It is grass roots done internet style.

During the town hall, which was co-hosted on FaceBook, there was a live scrolling chat of people posting comments while they viewed the event. That takes courage. Most of FaceBook’s users are younger and statistically many are the uninsured (or under insured) that stand to benefit from healthcare reform. This is an energetic group that is open to sharing exactly what is on their minds, even if it is counter to the President’s plan. It sends a message: The White House is comfortable with ideas that run counter to their own, maybe even open to them. That means more people will participate in the conversation. Its a powerful way to grow an audience – who’d have thought, being inclusive really works.

What can Healthcare organizations learn from this event? For starters, it is a fairly transparent and portable idea. Copy it. Host your own town hall events internally and externally. Invite your employees and patients and physicians to submit video questions before the event and to participate via social sites during the show. Encourage  people ask the hard questions – “what do we for charity care?” “How are we improving our communities?” “What can we do better and what do we do really well right now?”
If healthcare organizations want to have a voice in the discussion, they need to follow the lead of the White House.

Thanks to Tom Stitt for the insightful brainstorming on this topic.
__

By the way – there was a nice but subtle reference to Atul Gawande’s article in the New Yorker which you can find here.

If you don’t know Gwande’s work, check out his book Better:

Category: healthcare

Tagged: , , , ,

  • cymon
    Yes and no.

    Yes this is a great idea but only if done "open". Having the American people in an open townhall event is a great idea and one that the private health insurance companies could use to get some good feedback.

    No because this was all controlled and staged. The questions in yesterday's Obama townhall meeting were pre-screened and members of the audience were hand selected, obviously. I watched it in awe and couldn't believe how staged it was. They are just trying to sell Obamacare to the media and the American people. Don't believe me? The emotional women with cancer (Debby Smith) has been working with Senator Tom Daschle and the Obama administration for quite sometime now (http://foxyurl.com/n9C). Completely staged. I wish I could get my hands on a digital copy of an article in today's Washington Post today called "Chapter and Verse" that completely uncovers the staged townhall meeting.

    Going slightly off-topic....

    You already know my feelings on this....this is the complete wrong direction we need to go. This is the complete opposite of capitalism and the land of the free. We have seen from nations around the world that this will not work. Reports from Canada showed that the average wait for treatment for life-threatening cancer is 7 weeks and an average of 9 hour wait for emergency room visits....that is ridiculous. Canadian's come down here for treatment, because they can't get it there. On top of that the elderly get pushed to the back of the line and the government refuses to pay for important yet expensive drugs because of costs!

    Sure Obama says we will have a government program and private programs, but the private programs will not be able to compete with the government. The government has taxpayer money to fund their program and can run on a debt and without making money. A private company cannot run on a debt and has to make a profit. Companies providing healthcare to their employees will move to the government plan because it will be more affordable and the private companies will die. Obama says you can keep your plan and your doctor...that is just not true. What happens when your company moves to a government plan? Sure you can opt out of the government plan and try to get your old private plan back but it will be way more expensive without your companies premium.

    When Medicare was proposed it was reported that it would cost roughly 100 million a year. We are now around 100 billion a year. The president says it will cost 1-1.5 trillion for this (and that is the best best case scenario)...what do you think it will actually cost in the long run?

    Do I think current healthcare system is fine? No. Do I think it needs reform? Yes. So what do I propose? I think we should move to a program where everyone/every family is responsible for their own healthcare. A program that removes our employers. This way the healthcare companies can price plans for the individuals and families rather than for large companies. This will also remove the issue of losing your healthcare when you lose your job....your healthcare can go with you to any job or lack of job. Think of it as a system similar to auto insurance....your responsibility. If you don't want to pay for it then you will face the consequences.

    Anyways, I saw you post this article on twitter yesterday and figured I would voice my opinion to you since I know we have touched on it in the past. I am eager to here your thoughts on all of this ;-)

    -Simon
blog comments powered by Disqus

Im on the internets

seriously, I like this stuff